Bailey began her article with a vital question: "What counts as a church?" How would you respond to that question? While I don't expect the zoning board to get it, I do wonder if religious institutions (that is, "churches") have a solid Biblical understanding. I also wonder if it hasn't been the "church" who is mostly to blame for this unfortunate and damaging misrepresentation of the real church.
Regardless of what zoning boards decide, it's up to us, the church, to revitalize the true meaning of the church. We are the body of Christ in action, not buildings or institutions. Bailey ends her article with a quote from Dan Dalton, chair of the American Bar Association's Religious Land Use section, who said "Church, is more than about Sunday mornings and Wednesday nights." Yes, much more!
What do you think? What counts as church? How can we get back to a more Biblical definition?